AIM 

4/20/23 

operate to the LNAV/VNAV minimums. Baro

−

VNAV may not be authorized on some approaches due to other 

factors, such as no local altimeter source being available. Baro

−

VNAV is not authorized on LPV procedures. 

Pilots are directed to their local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) for additional information. 

NOTE

−

 

RNAV and Baro

−

VNAV systems must have a manufacturer supplied electronic database which must include the waypoints, 

altitudes, and vertical data for the procedure to be flown. The system must be able to retrieve the procedure by name from 

the aircraft navigation database, not just as a manually entered series of waypoints. 

3.  ILS or RNAV (GPS) charts. 

(a) 

Some RNAV (GPS) charts will also contain an ILS line of minima to make use of the ILS precision 

final in conjunction with the RNAV GPS capabilities for the portions of the procedure prior to the final approach 

segment and for the missed approach. Obstacle clearance for the portions of the procedure other than the final 

approach segment is still based on GPS criteria. 

NOTE

−

 

Some GPS receiver installations inhibit GPS navigation whenever

 ANY 

ILS frequency is tuned. Pilots flying aircraft with 

receivers installed in this manner must wait until they are on the intermediate segment of the procedure prior to the PFAF 

(PFAF is the active waypoint) to tune the ILS frequency and must tune the ILS back to a VOR frequency in order to fly the 

GPS based missed approach. 

(b)  Charting

.  There are charting differences between ILS, RNAV (GPS), and GLS approaches. 

(1) 

The LAAS procedure is titled “GLS RWY XX” on the approach chart. 

(2) 

The VDB provides information to the airborne receiver where the guidance is synthesized. 

(3) 

The LAAS procedure is identified by a four alpha

−

numeric character field referred to as the RPI 

or approach ID and is similar to the IDENT feature of the ILS. 

(4) 

The RPI is charted. 

(5) 

Most RNAV(GPS) approach charts have had the GLS (NA) minima line replaced by an LPV line 

of minima. 

(6) 

Since the concepts for LAAS and WAAS procedure publication have evolved, GLS will now be 

used only for LAAS minima, which will be on a separate approach chart. 

4.  Required Navigation Performance (RNP). 

(a) 

Pilots are advised to refer to the “TERMS/LANDING MINIMUMS DATA” (Section A) of the U.S. 

Government Terminal Procedures books for aircraft approach eligibility requirements by specific RNP level 

requirements. 

(b) 

Some aircraft have RNP approval in their AFM without a GPS sensor. The lowest level of sensors 

that the FAA will support for RNP service is DME/DME. However, necessary DME signal may not be available 

at the airport of intended operations. For those locations having an RNAV chart published with LNAV/VNAV 

minimums, a procedure note may be provided such as “DME/DME RNP

−

0.3 NA.” This means that RNP aircraft 

dependent on DME/DME to achieve RNP

−

0.3 are not authorized to conduct this approach. Where DME facility 

availability is a factor, the note may read “DME/DME RNP

−

0.3 Authorized; ABC and XYZ Required.” This 

means that ABC and XYZ facilities have been determined by flight inspection to be required in the navigation 

solution to assure RNP

−

0.3. VOR/DME updating must not be used for approach procedures. 

5.  Chart Terminology. 

(a) 

Decision Altitude (DA) replaces the familiar term Decision Height (DH). DA conforms to the 

international convention where altitudes relate to MSL and heights relate to AGL. DA will eventually be 

published for other types of instrument approach procedures with vertical guidance, as well. DA indicates to the 

pilot that the published descent profile is flown to the DA (MSL), where a missed approach will be initiated if 

visual references for landing are not established. Obstacle clearance is provided to allow a momentary descent 

Arrival Procedures

5

−

4

−

24